After retractions of two Covid-19 papers, scientists ask what went

With the retractions of two Covid-19 papers from top journals, the scientific community is once again wrestling with the question that arises any time a high-profile publication blows up: Could this have been prevented?

Disgraced COVID-19 studies are still routinely cited

Editor's Note Ramathibodi Medical Journal

Science Has an Ugly, Complicated Dark Side. And the Coronavirus Is Bringing It Out. – Mother Jones

Health care workers say protesting racial injustice should be part

Analysis: Retractions and controversies over coronavirus research show the scientific process is working

RETRACTED: Impacts on Global Temperature During the First Part of 2020 Due to the Reduction in Human Activities by COVID-19 - Saeed Shojaei, Pedram Ashofteh, Ngakan Ketut Acwin Dwijendra, Assefa M. Melesse

How COVID-19 exposed the frailties in scientific publishing – Monash Lens

Looming Retraction Casts Shadow Over Ranga Dias and Study of Superconductors - The New York Times

6-month consequences of COVID-19 in patients discharged from hospital: a cohort study - The Lancet

2021: A review of the year's 3,200 retractions – Retraction Watch

Health care workers say protesting racial injustice should be part

Another retraction looms for embattled physicist behind blockbuster superconductivity claims, Science

A rural getaway fears it may be next to fall in Covid-19 pandemic